There are of course physical limitations to the interesting and ongoing commercial strive for higher glass furnace pull rates. One of those constraints is the maximum temperature that the crown refractory has to withstand, which has a direct correlation with the amount of energy that can be applied by combustion of fuel. To enable the input of more energy, without the side effects of higher superstructure refractory temperatures, there is another method which we all know as electrical boosting. Not only is boosting capable of applying potential amounts of energy to the melt, it is also capable of providing better control of glass melt flow currents and stirring effects, resulting in better and more efficient fining processes (especially in the case of barrier boosting).
Electrical boosting is in principal a very efficient method of energy transfer as long as the system that provides the electrical power is built in line with the latest technical standards.
The paper will describe how multiple zone boosting systems can provide an optimum of power controland power distribution, basically by controlling the power to each pair of electrodes separately. It will illustrate how to avoid typical “glass melt hot spots” that can occur by controlling multiple electrodes in one zone.
The paper will explain the different methods of controlling power with semi conductors (thyristors) and will give more information about how possible negative side effects, like reactive power, peak power demand and harmonic distortion can be solved through smart methods of control.
It will also explain how different boosting system designs, using higher intermediary voltages and super compact water cooled transformers contribute to:
The water cooled transformers can be located closer to the load of the circuit, so reducing the losses in the system. These losses are both resistive and reactive and will decrease the power used and increase the power factor of the system.
Furnace boosting systems
There are many ways of controlling the electrical power of a furnace boosting system.?Before high power variable transformers became available, multiple tapped transformers?were used. With those transformers the power could only be controlled in several fixed?and predefined steps and in many of these applications the transformers primary high?voltage had to be switched off before the secondary taps could be switched. This led to?unwanted high voltage switch gear wear and eventually to unwanted boosting interruption?due to the necessary switch gear maintenance. Negative power control effects caused by?incoming power fluctuations are difficult to control with such systems and therefore?those incoming line fluctuations could have a direct and relatively quick and?uncontrollable effect on glass temperatures.
Most often today, high power variable transformers are installed. The main advantage of?those transformers is that they are capable of applying continuous controlled power to?the boosting electrodes. These transformers are capable of controlling incoming power?line fluctuations and are easily adapted to furnace (advanced) control strategies. The?main disadvantage is that the slide-wires are subject to wear, especially in those?applications where they are used to control constantly incoming line fluctuations orthe boosting system is used to control the glass temperature. Repairs of mechanical?parts in such transformers are expensive and time consuming. Due to the fact that they?are normally oil-filled they also have to be placed in a specially equipped roomwhich is in most cases too close to the furnace. Consequently such a boosting system?line-up will need to have long and expensive electrode wiring or bus-bars introducing?unwanted resistive and inductive power losses. We also need to take into account that?modern variable transformers often have oil/water heat exchangers and should be?considered as water cooled boosting systems.
Simultaneously, high power silicon controlled rectifier systems became available and?those systems also found their way into the furnace boosting control systems. The main?advantages of SCR (Silicon Controlled Rectifier) controlled systems are of course thatthey are based on solid state technology and will show no signs of wear, that they are?continuously controllable and that they are capable of very precise power, voltage or?current control. The thyristor part (the high power element) of these controllers are?basically still the same, however, the latest digital micro electronics have taken over?the part that controls these thyristors providing new ways of control, overall system?efficiency improvements and increased preciseness.
On load stepless transformer based boosting design
Due to the fact that stepless transformers are oil filled, they have to be located?outside the building in a specially designed and approved building. The distance?between the transformer and the furnace is therefore relatively long. A stepless?transformer converts incoming high line voltage directly down to the boosting electrode?at a maximum of 200Vac (container glass applications). In order to apply sufficientpower to the furnace the current running in between the electrodes and the transformers?is relatively high. According to Ohm’s law and assuming that an average of 400kVA is?applied to a single boosting zone, the current running through the transformer,?cabling/busbar and electrodes will be 2000A. Cabling/busbar losses will be P=I2.R, thus?twice the current will result in quadruple the cable/busbar losses and vice versathus ? current equals ? power losses over the cabling/busbar. Another negative side?effect is that it is hard to achieve the optimum cable/busbar pathway, to keep loop?inductance a low as possible, because the transformer location as well as the electrode?positions is fixed. Either the cable/busbar design becomes very complicated and?expensive or the design is simple and cheap and potential energy losses, over the whole?furnace campaign, are taken for granted.
Dual transformer and SCR controlled boosting designFrom the single stepless transformer?design we learned that such a boosting system’s efficiency suffers from running high?currents at relatively low voltages. Even an expensive and improved cable/busbar design?will cause relatively high inductances leading to unwanted reactive power generation.?This reactive power has to be considered as power loss as it is not contributing to the?energy the system is capable of adding to the glass melt. Nevertheless, we will be?charged for real as well as reactive power.
The reactive power of the system will account for a higher total power charge and a?higher peak demand charge in the system. Because the system has to account for a higher?secondary voltage on the transformer with the large bus work, the turns ratio?(secondary voltage = primary voltage / turns ratio) will be lower causing more primary?current at a lower power factor to be needed in the application. Of coursethe incoming high line voltage and the maximum electrode voltage cannot be changed,?thus the only solution possible to work around these two fixed values is to run the?boosting control system at the highest possible voltage and lower that voltage to the desired boosting electrode voltage as close as possible to the electrodes. In other?words, avoid high currents running through cabling/busbars for as long as possible.
That can only be achieved by using a two transformer design and by putting the second?transformer as close as possible to the boosting electrodes. Our SCR controllers are?designed to control 690Vac*1 and therefore we advise the use of an air cooledline step down transformer to reduce the incoming line voltage down to 500V*2.?The SCR controller supplies its power at high voltage, (500V) to a water cooled?transformer located as close as possible to the boosting electrodes where the voltage?is transformed down to the desired electrode voltage of 200V. Thus, the long distance?running current is reduced by 2.5x and cable losses by 6.25x.?
Phase angle firing typically degrades the power factor while increasing harmonics and?electrical noise. With phase angle firing, the power factor decreases rapidly with?output power. At 50% power, the power factor is only 0.7. At 25% power, the same power?factor decreases even more to 0.5. Moreover, phase angle firing creates all sorts of?disturbances on the grid, such as harmonics, RFI, line losses, wasted energy (reactive?power or kVAr) and transformer overheating. The end-user will eventually be forced toincrease the capacity of their equipment to compensate for these disturbances, for?example by installing active or passive systems such as costly capacitors.
Improved SCR control
To overcome these issues and be able to profit from the advantage of a solid state two?transformer designed boosting system, we introduced load tap changing. This provides an?effective ?way of increasing power factor of an SCR driven power system. An automatic?LTC system can be used in either Phase Angle or Burst Firing modes of operation. By?adding several taps to the transformer with a dedicated SCR?for each tap, together with overlapping firing orders, such a system is capable of?running at an increased power factor over a much larger range when using phase angle?firing. Both pictures, ?above and below, show the same out
ut power ratings. The load tap changing system achieves a power factor of 0.92 at 40% of power while the single?SCR system is still running 0.62. Harmonics distortion is ?equally reduced with LTC?which also contributes to less reactive power and therefore improved efficiency.
Advantages of a multiple zones boosting system
In an SCR controlled dual transformer designed boosting system, we try to use as many?relatively small sub systems as possible. In fact, we advise the use of separate sub?systems for each pair of electrodes which are typically capable of supplying 300-400kVA*3.to the furnace. These sub systems can be fully standardized and will always?(and at every site) use the same intermediary voltage supplied by the high voltage step?down transformer which adapts the whole boosting system to the incoming line voltage.Boosting zone voltage adaptation and LTC tap tuning will be covered by multiple primary?taps at the boosting transformer. Such a standard system layout will decrease?engineering efforts, spare parts and overall system cost.?
In respect to multiple boosting electrodes zones, running controllable power on each?pair of electrodes makes the whole boosting system more flexible and avoids hot spots,?especially in so called barrier boosting zones, in which multiple electrodes are lined?up to improve fining by energizing the glass flow loops.
Hot spots may occur when all the electrodes are supplied by one phase, zone and/or?busbar. Automatically, the electrodes located in the hottest part of the zone will have?the lowest resistance and will therefore introduce more power compared to ones that are?running in a colder part of the zone. More power will result in increasing the?temperature of the part of the zone which is already running at a higher?temperature and therefore the whole barrier boosting system becomes difficult to?control. Multiple, smaller power systems controlling only two electrodes are easier to?control and are capable of applying most of the power to the part of the zone which is?the coldest.
Advantages of Water Cooled Transformers
Water Cooled transformers allow for several advantages in the system. The ambient?temperature rating for the transformer is the incoming water temperature (typically 30?°C) allowing the transformers to be located closer to the furnace than an air cooled?unit. Water flow rates are low (1 to 6 GPM for a single phase unit) with a small?pressure drop that can usually be put in series with other components in the existing?water system. Typically the water cooled transformer is going to be significantly?smaller than a similarly rated air cooled transformer allowing for placement in areas?unavailable to air cooled units. Water cooled transformers are fully sealed with an?epoxy resin allowing them to be in areas that have high dust contents and prevents?rubbish being inadvertently dropped into the windings and causing a failure. Water?cooled construction doesn’t have to allow for air gaps in the system for cooling which?means less inductive reactance in the transformer.
Multiple zones, SCR controlled boosting systems have many advantages:
Abbreviations & additional explanations
DCS – Distributed Control System
kVA –?kilo Volts x Ampere = power
MPC – Model based Predictive Control
LTC – Load Tap Changing
SCR – Silicon Controlled Rectifier also called Thyristor
V – Voltage
I – Current
Xl – Inductance
*1?We advice 690Vac as maximum intermediary voltage due to the fact that this voltage is ?still considered to be low voltage and no special measures need to be taken or special ?educated maintenance personnel is needed.
*2?We use +/-500V as intermediary voltage because of the physical properties of a ?transformer to transform the voltage applied to a specific tap up to a higher voltage ?level appearing on a higher tap.
*3?The power applied to a boosting zone is normally limited by the maximum electrode current and in order to prevent excessive wear should not exceed 1.5 – 2A/cm2. A 2inch?electrode being 27inches submerged into the glass melt will have a surface of 1115cm2?and therefore should not run above +/- 2000A. At 200V that results in +/- 400kVA.?
Download the article here.
Article presented at the 11th E.S.G. Conference, March, 2012.